Untargeted metabolomics reveals anion and organ‐specific metabolic responses of salinity tolerance in willow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Willows can alleviate soil salinisation while generating sustainable feedstock for biorefinery, yet the metabolomic adaptations underlying their tolerance remain poorly understood. Salix miyabeana was treated with two environmentally abundant salts, NaCl and Na2SO4, in a 12‐week pot trial. Willows tolerated salts across all treatments (up to 9.1 dS m−1 soil ECe), maintaining biomass while selectively partitioning ions, confining Na+ to roots and accumulating Cl− and in the canopy and adapting to osmotic stress via reduced stomatal conductance. Untargeted metabolomics captured >5000 putative compounds, including 278 core willow metabolome compounds constitutively produced across organs. Across all treatments, salinity drove widespread metabolic reprogramming, altering 28% of the overall metabolome, with organ‐tailored strategies. Comparing salt forms at equimolar sodium, shared differentially abundant metabolites were limited to 3% of the metabolome, representing the generalised salinity response, predominantly in roots. Anion‐specific metabolomic responses were extensive. NaCl reduced carbohydrates and tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates, suggesting potential carbon and energy resource pressure, and accumulated root structuring compounds, antioxidant flavonoids, and fatty acids. Na2SO4 salinity triggered accumulation of sulphur‐containing larger peptides, suggesting excess sulphate incorporation leverages ion toxicity to produce specialised salt‐tolerance‐associated metabolites. This high‐depth picture of the willow metabolome underscores the importance of capturing plant adaptations to salt stress at organ scale and considering ion‐specific contributions to soil salinity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".