MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409591891 · doi:10.1002/cam4.70881

Effect of Statins in the Watch and Wait Phase of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

2025· article· en· W4409591891 on OpenAlexafffund
David Spaner

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersLeukemia and Lymphoma Society of CanadaCancer Research SocietyLeukemia and Lymphoma Society
KeywordsChronic lymphocytic leukemiaMedicineStatinBeta-2 microglobulinInternal medicineLeukemiaCholesterolGastroenterologyImmunologyOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background It is an unclear how cholesterol‐lowering statin drugs affect progression of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Methods Clinical records of 57 CLL patients were examined to determine how initiating statins in the “watch and wait” phase of management affected disease progression. Results After 6.4 ± 0.6 months, when average low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels had been lowered from 3.58 ± 0.11 mM to 2.1 ± 0.06 mM, blood levels of CLL cells and beta‐2‐microglobulin (β2M) increased significantly, accompanied by significant decreases in platelets. Following statin institution, rates of change of blood lymphocytes and β2M increased from 1.55 ± 0.39 × 10 6 to 3.4 ± 0.68 × 10 6 cells/mL/month ( n = 43) and 0.035 ± 0.011 to 0.055 ± 0.007 μg/mL/month ( n = 40), respectively. Conventional first‐line CLL treatment was ultimately required in 37 patients. Conclusions These observations suggest that statins as single agent do not slow and may even modestly stimulate progression of CLL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer MedicineSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207