MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409592185 · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01633-y

Overcoming barriers in the use of artificial intelligence in point of care ultrasound

2025· review· en· W4409592185 on OpenAlexaff
Roberto Vega, Masood Dehghan, Arun Nagdev, Brian Buchanan, Jeevesh Kapur, Jacob L. Jaremko, Dornoosh Zonoobi

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Digital Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint (geometry)Point of care ultrasoundPoint of careUltrasoundPsychologyMedicineNursingRadiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Point-of-care ultrasound is a portable, low-cost imaging technology focused on answering specific clinical questions in real time. Artificial intelligence amplifies its capabilities by aiding clinicians in the acquisition and interpretation of the images; however, there are growing concerns on its effectiveness and trustworthiness. Here, we address key issues such as population bias, explainability and training of artificial intelligence in this field and propose approaches to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Digital MedicineSame topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFrench-language works237,207