Advancing perioperative care with digital applications and wearables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Digital biomarkers are quantifiable measures collected from digital health technologies that may act as indicators of biological processes 1 . The rapid increase in real-time health information collected from wearable devices has allowed digital biomarkers to emerge as a promising tool to support the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of various health conditions 1 . While digital biomarkers have broad applications in health care, their utilization in perioperative medicine represents an emerging area of study, practice development, and implementation science 1 . A discussion of the potential applications of digital biomarkers in perioperative care may be informative to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and other clinicians involved in caring for patients undergoing surgery. This is particularly relevant given multiple recent publications on digital biomarkers in perioperative care 2 , 3 , 4 . In this article, we discuss the potential role of digital biomarkers in the pre-operative, in-hospital, and post-operative phases of care to improve patient outcomes (Fig. 1 ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".