MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409594099 · doi:10.1016/j.cam.2025.116696

A frequency-independent solver for systems of linear ordinary differential equations

2025· article· en· W4409594099 on OpenAlexafffund
Tony Hu, James Bremer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods for differential equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsOrdinary differential equationSolverMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsLinear differential equationExponential integratorDifferential equationCalculus (dental)Differential algebraic equationMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When a system of first order linear ordinary differential equations has eigenvalues of large magnitude, its solutions generally exhibit complicated behaviour, such as high-frequency oscillations, rapid growth or rapid decay. The cost of representing such solutions using standard techniques grows with the magnitudes of the eigenvalues. As a consequence, the running times of standard solvers for ordinary differential equations also grow with the size of these eigenvalues. The solutions of scalar equations with slowly-varying coefficients, however, can be represented via slowly-varying phase functions at a cost which is bounded independent of the magnitudes of the eigenvalues of the corresponding coefficient matrix . Here we couple an existing solver for scalar equations which exploits this observation with a well-known technique for transforming a system of linear ordinary differential equations into scalar form . The result is a method for solving a large class of systems of linear ordinary differential equations in time independent of the magnitudes of the eigenvalues of their coefficient matrices. We discuss the results of numerical experiments demonstrating the properties of our algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational and Applied MathematicsSame topicNumerical methods for differential equationsFrench-language works237,207