MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

STRATEGI PENGELOLAAN DATA DAN INFORMASI GEOSPASIAL KABUPATEN BARITO KUALA

2025· article· id· W4409594323 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL SOCIOPOLITICO · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDecision Support System Applications
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Informasi geospasial merupakan perangkat penting untuk perencanaan, pengambilan keputusan, penanggulangan bencana, dan pelaksanaan kegiatan yang berkaitan dengan ruang bumi. Informasi ini merupakan alat yang sangat penting bagi pengambilan kebijakan, pengambilan keputusan, dan kegiatan ruang geografis, terbukti dari maraknya pemanfaatan peta dan informasi geospasial pada situs web resmi pemerintah daerah atau kementerian/lembaga. Begitu juga pada Kabupaten Barito Kuala yang walaupun sudah memiliki Rumah Data Batola namun belum maksimal pelaksanannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyusun rencana aksi pengelolaan data serta memberikan rekomendasi dalam pengelolaan data dan informasi geospasial Kabupaten Barito Kuala. Analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis SWOT untuk merumuskan rekomendasi kebijakan pengelolaan data Informasi Geospasial. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan terdapat tiga tahapan untuk menyempurnakan pengelolaan data dan Informasi Geospasial di Kabupaten Barito Kuala, yaitu tahapan pengembangan dan pemanfaatan data geospasial, tahapan peningkatan infrastruktur geospasial, dan tahapan peningkatan sumber daya manusia geospasial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it