MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409599722 · doi:10.36106/ijsr/7805324.

SERUM ZINC LEVELS AS A PREDICTOR OF MORTALITY IN UNDER 5 CHILDREN WITH PNEUMONIA

2025· article· en· W4409599722 on OpenAlexaff
Srikala Bharath, Jeffrey S. Jeffrey S., Krishnamurthy Krishnamurthy

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsCanadian Paediatric Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPneumoniaMedicineZincInternal medicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: 1.To assess the reliability of serum Zinc levels as predictor of mortality in children with Pneumonia; 2. and to compare serum Zinc levels in pneumonia and severe pneumonia. Method: It is a prospective observational study that included all children aged 2 months to 59 months with features of pneumonia or severe pneumonia as per the Revised WHO guidelines 2014 for paediatric pneumonia. Serum Zinc levels were measured in all children included in the study, whereas the PRISM 3 scoring system was applied only to children with Severe disease who were admitted to the PICU. Serum Zinc levels of < 80mcg/dl suggested Zinc deficiency. All children were followed up for the predefined primary outcomes – Discharge/ Death. The association of low serum Zinc levels in severe pneumonia and the accuracy of Serum Zinc levels in predicting mortality was assessed using appropriate statistical methods. Results: Of the 100 children enrolled in the study, 54% were <1 year of age, with a slight male preponderance in incidence of pneumonia. 54% of included children had features suggestive of severe pneumonia at admission. Case fatality rates were 0% in the pneumonia group and 22.4% in the severe pneumonia group. The mean Serum Zinc levels were 82.81 +/- 19.989 mcg/dl in the pneumonia group and 71.98 +/- 26.605 mcg/dl in the severe pneumonia group(p = 0.029). The mean PRISM 3 score was 25.92(SD 3.715) in the mortality group whereas it was 1.56 (SD 7.216) in the discharge group (p = <0.001).There was a strong negative correlation ( r of - 0.708) between Serum Zinc levels and the PRISM 3 score. PRISM 3 had an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.993 (95% CI of 0.925 to 1.000) whereas Serum Zinc had AUC of 0.958 (95% CI of 0.870 to 0.993) with a sensitivity of 92.31%, specificity of 91.95%, PPV of 63.2% and NPV of 98.8% in predicting mortality in childhood pneumonia. Conclusion: Serum Zinc levels can be a simple test to predict mortality in children with pneumonia .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207