MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409601646 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00121.2025

Cardiac energy substrate utilization in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: reconciling conflicting evidence on fatty acid and glucose metabolism

2025· review· en· W4409601646 on OpenAlexaff
Lina A. Shehadeh, Emely Robleto, Gary D. Lopaschuk

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMiami Heart Research InstituteAmerican Heart AssociationU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionEjection fractionHeart failureDiseaseMedicineInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct measurements reveal fatty acid oxidation remains active or increased in HFpEF hearts, whereas glucose oxidation becomes impaired, challenging previous assumptions. Apparent contradictions in HFpEF metabolism literature arise from methodological differences-studies using isolated mitochondria versus intact hearts. Evidence demonstrates fatty acid oxidation is maintained in HFpEF, with defects primarily in glucose oxidation. Successful therapeutic strategies should prioritize restoring metabolic flexibility rather than simply modulating fatty acid oxidation pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207