Resource Allocation and Optimal Path Selection of Civic and Political Education Curriculum Based on Multi-Objective Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper combines the project response theory to dynamically adjust and update the resources according to the learning effect and learning feedback in the process of Civic Education, so as to achieve the goal of matching the learners with the learning resources and realize efficient learning.The differential artificial raindrop algorithm based on perturbation mechanism is designed to realize the solution of multi-objective combinatorial optimization of learning resource allocation.Performance experiments show that the convergence curve of the resource allocation algorithm in this paper is gradually flattened, and the algorithm still has the evolutionary ability, the convergence curve is still decreasing, and the final characteristic difference value is also better than other BPSOR and GAR algorithms.In the case of the number of learning resources of 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, the time consumed is 207ms, 1602ms, 20506ms, 68430ms, 354687, all of which are the lowest, and the success rate is also the highest in the model.The optimal learning path is applied to an experimental class in a university for a 6-week teaching experiment, and the experimental class scores 87.2 points in the Civics test, which is much higher than the control class.This paper realizes the accurate capture of students' Civics learning problems and the recommendation of targeted teaching resources, which can improve the quality and effect of Civics teaching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".