MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409602134 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-045

Design of Interactive Control System for Agricultural Machines Based on AR and Deep Reinforcement Learning

2025· article· en· W4409602134 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceControl (management)AgricultureHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligenceReinforcementEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intellectualization of agricultural machinery can effectively improve the efficiency and quality of operations, and has an important role in promoting agricultural development.Based on AR technology, this paper introduces the key technology to build the interactive control system of agricultural machinery, uses NURBS to realize virtual agricultural machinery modeling, uses VRML technology to design a prototype of the scene environment of interactive farmland virtual reality, and details the methods of virtual modeling, virtual roaming, interactive control and collision detection in the process of system development.A four-degree-of-freedom simulation test bed is established to realize the simulation of the tractor's attitude when walking in the field.The position information of the crop rows is extracted from the virtual scene, and the control signals are given according to this information to carry out the speed, direction and balance control of the traveling of the agricultural machine, so that the tractor travels along the crop rows.The maximum deviations of the roll angle, pitch angle and yaw angle are within 0.36, and the maximum deviations of the elevation and traveling speed are 2.11 mm and 0.14 km/h.The simulation analysis and the physical test show the feasibility of the interactive control system of the farm machine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207