Research on deep learning-based fault diagnosis of power metering system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Power metering system is directly related to the production and operation level and benefit of power supply enterprises, and even has a close relationship with the national economic development and people's life.Numerous scholars have applied deep learning to the field of fault diagnosis.Accordingly, this paper proposes a fault diagnosis method for power metering system based on stacked autoencoder (SAE) algorithm.The deep learning data samples are formed by comprehensively collecting the historical operation data of the system and the feature data provided by the third-party manufacturers.And the fault diagnosis model is designed with the SAE algorithm, and the training and optimization fine-tuning of the algorithm model is realized by BP neural network.Finally, the model is trained using explicit test data samples, and the BP neural network can reach the set accuracy after 3804 training sessions with the output error.Compared to Elman neural network iterations are less and converge faster.Using the trained fault detection model of power metering system for fault diagnosis, the model can successfully classify the faults and achieve the expected diagnostic effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".