Building a Co-construction and Sharing Model of Digital Ideological and Political Resources for Embedded Courses Based on Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At present, there are differences in the building of information in various career institutions.The degree of implementation of management, teaching and services is uneven, and educational resources are limited and unevenly distributed.The construction of educational resources includes the overall layout, structure and quantity of resources, information mode, service impact, etc, all of which require systematic planning.Under the above background, this paper conducted research on the topic of building a model of co-construction and sharing of digital ideological and political resources for embedded courses based on artificial intelligence algorithms, and considered the insufficiency of the existing digital ideological and political resources in the allocation efficiency and insufficient system sharing, as well as creatively used artificial intelligence algorithms to improve the previous system.In the algorithm, the texture mapping of the system was carried out, and the duty cycle of each columnar area was specified.In the experiment, the number of resources in the digital resource platform was investigated, and the input of different types of colleges and universities in digital ideological and political resources was collected.The explanation of experimental data: 83% of 985/211 colleges and universities used the database designed in this paper, and 17% of them actively built the database; 57% of the general undergraduate schools used the database designed in this paper, and 20% were under construction, as well as 13% were still preparing.This showed that in general undergraduate schools, a small proportion of the digital ideological and political resource sharing model was used, and the 985/211 colleges and universities had relatively good investment in the construction of digital ideological and political resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".