MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409603321 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-134

Study on the role of electromagnetic waves in quantum entanglement and quantum state transport based on constrained optimization algorithm

2025· article· en· W4409603321 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum entanglementQuantumPhysicsState (computer science)Quantum mechanicsQuantum discordAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the current fields of quantum information processing and quantum computing, fast and accurate quantum state manipulation and preparation have been of keen interest to researchers, and their potential applications are mainly in quantum measurement, quantum information, quantum communication, and quantum sensing.In this paper, the Hilbert space of a bipartite state system is unfolded by four Bell state entanglement bases and the result is projected to the subsystem to obtain a mixed state.A quantum approximation algorithm is proposed to provide a solution to the combinatorial optimization problem, and based on the workflow of the quantum approximation optimization algorithm, an improvement is proposed to the quantum approximation optimization algorithm to solve the constrained problem using the quadratic unconstrained binary optimization method.Based on the theory of cavity magnetism, the hybrid quantum system model is constructed, and the calculation method of Hamiltonian quantity is proposed.Combined with the quantum entanglement optimal path calculation of UQAOA algorithm, the optimal value of time-microwave entanglement ac E is obtained at r=0.234, so the compression parameter r=0.2 is used in the calculation.Based on the UQAOA algorithm for the analysis of the transmission characteristics of the generated OMA wave in air and the transmission optimization problem, the simulation obtains the reflection coefficient is slightly lower than that of the test, and the maximal error error is controlled at 7.5dB around, and the two results are basically in agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicEducational Technology and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207