Analyzing UFC Mixed Martial Arts Data Based on a Multilayer Perceptron Algorithm to Provide Insight and Teach Performance Evaluation to College Fighters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Teaching and correcting athletes' techniques by analyzing and referring to the performance of professional tournament players can improve the teaching level and quality of wushu movements.In this paper, the performance of college students in UFC tournaments is taken as the research data, and the multilayer perceptron algorithm is used to process the images and carry out the global modeling of wushu fighting action images.The network coding design is used to improve the data transmission rate of the algorithm, and the activation function is used as the nonlinear expression method of the algorithm.The Tanh_Softsign activation function is improved to counteract the noise interference of the dataset images, in order to construct the multilayer perceptual machine algorithm and develop the learning of martial arts fighting action scores.After optimizing the learning of UFC martial arts action scores by this algorithm, this algorithm shows a high correlation between the performance scores of students and the professional teachers' scores of an elective class of martial arts in a university with P>0.05, which indicates that the algorithm in this paper can accurately assess the students' action performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".