Application of Multi Information Data Fusion in College Public Sports Basketball Teaching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the deepening reform of quality education, the requirements for physical education teaching in colleges and universities have become increasingly strict.In this era of rapid renewal and development of multimedia information technology, in order to make the traditional sports basketball teaching keep up with the pace of the trend and to search for the future development direction of college public sports basketball teaching, this paper studied the application of multi information data fusion technology in college public sports basketball teaching.The remote sensing technology and global positioning system in the multi information data fusion technology were used to conduct real-time detection and statistics on the sports effects of students in basketball teaching, and the relevant experimental scheme was designed.The data results recorded by manual recording and multi information data fusion technology were compared.The experimental results showed that when three student representatives and remote sensing technology simultaneously counted the times of passing and touching, the success rate of passing and the scoring rate of throwing for four sports members, the accuracy of remote sensing technology was higher; the Global Positioning System (GPS) system could effectively record the running distance, average speed and heart rate of 4 athletes.The average speed of No. 3 athlete was 9.1 m/s; the passing rate and shooting rate were both 50%, and the average speed of No. 4 athlete was 7.85 m/s.The pass success rate was 50%, and the shooting rate was only 33.3%.These data were conducive to teachers' timely understanding of students' personal conditions and basketball level, which could improve the efficiency of college sports basketball teaching and also increase the quality of students' sports.At the same time, the questionnaire survey method was also used to study the results of the introduction of multi information data fusion technology.The findings shown that multi-information data fusion technology might increase students' passion for learning basketball courses, hence improving the quality of sports, by altering their interest and attitude.In order to provide guidance for the future development of college public sports basketball instruction, this study offered a reference value for the application of multi-information data fusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".