MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409603673 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-223

Research on intelligent operation and maintenance of electrochemical energy storage plant based on multimodal fusion sensing technology

2025· article· en· W4409603673 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrochemical energy storageFusionEnergy storageComputer scienceProcess engineeringSensor fusionSystems engineeringElectrochemistryReliability engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligenceSupercapacitorChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to realize the intelligent operation and maintenance of electrochemical energy storage power station and make the working process of the power station battery more efficient, stable and safe, this paper establishes a safety monitoring system of electrochemical energy storage power station through multimodal fusion sensing technology.The multi-sensor fusion technology and multi-sensor calibration process are proposed, and the Kalman joint filter fusion algorithm is obtained based on the traditional Kalman filter extension, which fuses the collected multi-modal sensing data to realize the real-time detection of the state information of each battery of the energy storage power station.Simulation experiments are carried out to verify the reliability of the Kalman joint filter fusion algorithm, and the deviation value of this algorithm in the filter fusion processing is only 0.1426, which is lower than that of the comparative sliding average filtering algorithm.The RMSE values of X-axis and Y-axis in the motion target tracking experiments are less than those of the comparative mean drift algorithm 0.189 and 0.1412, and in the speed, they are less than those of 0.0062 and 0.0073, which are better in terms of accuracy performance.And in the application practice of battery safety monitoring system for electrochemical energy storage power station, the error between SOC estimation and actual value is less than 5% in either DST condition or UDDS condition, and the internal resistance 0 R change curve is similar to the actual value of the internal resistance, and the estimation error is less than 4%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it