MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409603721 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-185

An Efficient Construction Method for Matrix Decomposition-Based Natural Language Processing Models in Low-Dimensional Embedding Space

2025· article· en· W4409603721 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHanshan Normal University
KeywordsEmbeddingComputer scienceSpace (punctuation)DecompositionMatrix (chemical analysis)Matrix decompositionNatural (archaeology)Parallel computingArtificial intelligenceMaterials sciencePhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural language processing (NLP) is developing very rapidly in the field of artificial intelligence, and has become an important direction in the development of computer science field and artificial intelligence industry.In this paper, in order to realize the efficient construction of natural language processing model in low-dimensional embedding space, firstly, a word vector learning model is constructed based on matrix decomposition for word vectors in natural language processing.On this basis, in order to further realize the efficient construction of natural language processing models, this paper designs the Semantic Discarding Network (SDN) and Semantic Fusion Alignment Method (SFA) for the problem of interfering semantics of the model and the problem of a single way of fusion of local inference results.Finally, the SDF-NN natural language processing model is proposed and a multi-view subspace clustering (DLTE) method based on deep low-rank tensor embedding is proposed.The results of the research experiments show that the average performance index of this paper's word vector model for each task in three corpora ranges from 71.55 to 89.11, and the performance is stable and the time overhead in the three corpora is 3.93, 7.29, and 13.42 minutes, respectively, and the speed of the model has been significantly improved and the overall performance is better.In addition, the natural language processing model (SDF-NN) constructed in this paper achieves the best performance in the comparison test with strong competitiveness, which further validates the performance of the matrix decomposition-based natural language processing model in this paper, and provides the method and direction for its efficient construction in low-dimensional embedding space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicAdvanced Computational Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207