A Study of Knowledge Transfer in English Translation Teaching Based on Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study firstly introduces the working principle of deep learning-based neural machine translation model (NMT) and its recurrent neural network translation backbone network, which enhances the semantic characterization capability through Glove word embedding layer.A tree-to-sequence based attention mechanism is innovatively introduced at the encoder side, and a tree-based encoder is appended to the traditional sequence encoder to construct syntax-aware context vectors.On the decoder side, the syntactic tree structure information is integrated into the sequence-to-sequence model (seq2seq), and this model is used to explore the knowledge transfer effect of the English translation teaching process.The results show that the accuracy rates of the neural machine English translation models incorporating syntactic information proposed in this paper are all above 90%.The experiment on the effect of English translation teaching shows that the mean values of students' scores on the post-test of long sentence translation and composition translation in the reading section of the experimental class increased by 11.022 and 12.5388 points respectively compared with those of the control class, with significant differences between the scores of the two groups of students (p<0.05), and the same significant differences are presented between the scores on the pre-test and post-test of the students' scores on the long sentence translation and composition translation in the experimental class.It can be seen that the application of the model can effectively promote knowledge transfer and help students better understand and utilize translation skills.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".