Computing-based Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Curriculum Design and Its Practical Research in Cultivating Innovative Abilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In-depth investigation of the combination of innovation and entrepreneurship education and computing technology is of great theoretical and practical significance for the continuous promotion of innovation and entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities.In this paper, after clarifying the three elements of environment, subject and behavior in the design of innovation and entrepreneurship education courses, we design an innovative teaching model for innovation and entrepreneurship education courses based on computing technology and digital learning environment, and adopt similarity metrics and questionnaires to count the frequency of students' on-line learning behaviors and the level of cultivation of their innovative spirit and ability respectively.The results of teaching practice show that the practice of innovation and entrepreneurship education courses based on computing has a facilitating effect on the cultivation of students' innovative spirit and ability.The Spearman correlation coefficients of the learning behaviors in the online teaching platform of innovation and entrepreneurship education courses and the dimensions of innovation spirit and ability show medium-high correlation (r>0.3), and its regression model can effectively explain more than 60% of the variance of innovation spirit and ability.The research in this paper provides an effective reference for the innovative development and practice of innovation and entrepreneurship education programs, and lays the foundation for promoting more effective and innovative development of dual innovation education in colleges and universities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".