Research on the association between acupuncture points and diseases based on the construction of knowledge graph and applied research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acupuncture has been recognized by more and more experts as a treatment method to relieve various pains in human body, but the association between specific acupuncture treatments and diseases is still unclear, which affects the long-term development of acupuncture treatment.In this paper, we abstract the knowledge of acupuncture points as ontologies in the knowledge graph, and propose a method to improve the RoBERTa-WWM-BiGRU-CRF model to optimize the knowledge extraction of the knowledge graph by combining the SoftLexicon technique and the adversarial training method.Based on the knowledge graph of acupuncture points, the collaborative filtering model is introduced, and the original similarity matrix construction method is replaced by the co-occurrence matrix construction method based on the association characteristics of acupuncture points and diseases, which improves the operational efficiency of the association search and realizes the design of the association search technology of acupuncture points and diseases.The average consultation time in the acupuncture outpatient departments of the experimental and control groups applying this paper's technology for acupuncture visits was faster than that of the full outpatient clinic by 0.32 min, showing a significant difference (P<0.05).Patients in the experimental group who received acupuncture treatment assisted by the technology of this paper were higher than those in the control group in the dimensions of acupuncture treatment experience, such as physiological reflections, treatment emotions, and treatment effects and treatment feeling dimensions, which were 2.22, 3.57, 2.2, and 1.33, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".