A high-performance computing-supported model for monitoring the effect of ideological education in a big data environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper constructs a set of models for monitoring and evaluating the effect of Civics education through the research on the evaluation of Civics education based on educational big data environment.First, based on distributed gray cluster analysis, it analyzes and researches students' Civics learning behavior, and explores learners' learning characteristics by mining meaningful behavioral features for cluster analysis.The second is to design the Civics teaching quality evaluation model using principal component analysis, test the effects of population size and convolution kernel number on the performance of the Civics teaching quality evaluation model, and optimize the teaching quality evaluation model by using the dimensionality-reduced evaluation data.Distributed gray cluster analysis gets four clusters according to the characteristics of students' learning behaviors, which are divided into excellent, diligent, average, and negative students.PCA selection of evaluation indexes found that the cumulative contribution rate of the first 10 principal component indexes to the evaluation of the quality of Civic Teaching in colleges and universities has reached 95.63%, which indicates that these 10 indexes can adequately evaluate the quality of Civic Teaching in colleges and universities.When the number of population size is taken as 31 and the number of optimal convolution kernels is taken as 19 values, the RMSE of the evaluation model is 0.01973, and the test time consumed is 0.0783ms, which is the best performance.The constructed Civics education effect monitoring model can effectively assess students' learning behavior and efficiently and accurately evaluate the quality of Civics teaching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".