MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409603821 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-160

Research on Morphological Innovation in City Brand Image Based on Computer Graphics Technology

2025· article· en· W4409603821 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer graphics (images)Computer graphicsComputer scienceGraphicsImage (mathematics)Brand imageBusinessMultimediaComputer visionAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban spatial structure and three-dimensional perspective can express personalized city brand image, which is an important feature of city brand form.In this paper, computer graphics technology is applied to design a city 3D modeling algorithm based on point cloud fusion, which transforms city information into city spatial visual symbols, and then carries out the innovation of city brand image morphology.Firstly, on the basis of binocular stereo vision, tilted image generation modeling technology is utilized to realize texture mapping 3D dense point cloud structure network.Aiming at the lack of accuracy of the sparse point cloud and the existence of noise points and mesh voids due to the influence of occlusion and shadows, we design the stereo vision PMVS algorithm based on the faceted slice in order to realize the densification of the point cloud.The algorithm performance is tested on the dataset using standard 3D reconstruction evaluation metrics F-score, chamfer distance (CD), and the application analysis of segmentation and merging execution efficiency for building clusters, optimization effect of rectangle fitting, and height calculation of building clusters, and the study finds that this paper's algorithm is ahead of the baseline model in 13 categories.When the number of regions reaches 70,000, the traditional RAG method takes 26.9 seconds, while this paper's algorithm only takes 14.8 seconds.The time consumption reduction reaches more than 40%.The average score of the aesthetic assessment of the city brand design is 83.47 points, and the 10 experts' evaluation of the spatial aesthetics is above 90 points, and the design is unanimously recognized.The study makes a useful exploration for the innovation of city brand image under the conditions of cutting-edge information technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207