MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409603838 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-157

Research on Digitization and Diversified Cultural and Creative Design of Traditional Handicraft Elements Based on Deep Learning

2025· article· en· W4409603838 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigitizationHandicraftCultural heritageArtificial intelligenceArchitectural engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringVisual artsArtGeographyArchaeologyComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of digital technology provides more possibilities for the inheritance of Chinese excellent traditional handicrafts.This paper takes Chinese movable type printing as the research object, and develops and designs a user-oriented virtual experience system by combining its handicraft characteristics.In order to optimize the rendering of real-time images and video frames of the virtual scene in this system, this paper takes the deep learning oversampling algorithm as the basic framework, and uses two major types of neural network structures, namely convolutional neural network (CNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN), to carry out the rendering reconstruction, and at the same time, it uses the texture enhancement oversampling algorithm to recover the image texture details, improve the edge sharpness of the image, and comprehensively build the DLSS model.The performance of the DLSS model constructed in this paper and the virtual experience system of movable type printing is tested successively.The average score difference between the pre-and post-tests of the virtual experience system of this paper is 34.46, which is much higher than that of the traditional form of knowledge mastery of 20.76, indicating that the virtual experience system supported by this paper's algorithms can effectively carry out the inheritance of traditional handicrafts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207