Research on Digitization and Diversified Cultural and Creative Design of Traditional Handicraft Elements Based on Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of digital technology provides more possibilities for the inheritance of Chinese excellent traditional handicrafts.This paper takes Chinese movable type printing as the research object, and develops and designs a user-oriented virtual experience system by combining its handicraft characteristics.In order to optimize the rendering of real-time images and video frames of the virtual scene in this system, this paper takes the deep learning oversampling algorithm as the basic framework, and uses two major types of neural network structures, namely convolutional neural network (CNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN), to carry out the rendering reconstruction, and at the same time, it uses the texture enhancement oversampling algorithm to recover the image texture details, improve the edge sharpness of the image, and comprehensively build the DLSS model.The performance of the DLSS model constructed in this paper and the virtual experience system of movable type printing is tested successively.The average score difference between the pre-and post-tests of the virtual experience system of this paper is 34.46, which is much higher than that of the traditional form of knowledge mastery of 20.76, indicating that the virtual experience system supported by this paper's algorithms can effectively carry out the inheritance of traditional handicrafts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".