Research on optimization method of cross-border e-commerce supply chain resource allocation based on Hamiltonian loop algorithm in digital economy environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, foreign research on the optimal allocation of supply chain resources and operational coordination in the digital economy environment has also made more and more progress, and the current status of domestic research is in the development stage, and supply chain management in the context of the digital economy has become another research hotspot.In this regard, this paper studies the application of Hamiltonian circuit in supply chain resource allocation from three aspects, such as product pricing strategy, supply chain management optimization and consumer behavior, and constructs the optimal resource allocation model according to the steps of resource allocation establishment.Through the Hamiltonian loop algorithm, the revenue function of cross-border ecommerce supply chain services is obtained.Using the Hamiltonian loop algorithm, the optimal price model of supply chain logistics is simulated and simulated experiments are carried out, and the optimal logistics and distribution services will be priced at about 225 under the high competition situation with competition coefficient 0.6 k . Under the optimal allocation of supply chain resources, analyzing the user's satisfaction, retail customers' satisfaction with the supply of goods in 2021 is 81.806 points, higher than the province's 0.913 points, and the experimental results show that the resource allocation model can meet the needs of the customers, making the supply and demand of the product resources more balanced, which argues the scientific nature and reliability of this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".