MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Removing trophic levels from the fish feed-chain: Evaluating the nutritional and microbiome effects of feeding brewery protein isolate as an alternative to insect meal to Atlantic salmon

2025· article· en· W4409605014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAquaculture · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersUniversity of Stirling
KeywordsBiologyTrophic levelFish mealFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Gut microbiomeAquacultureZoologyMealInsectMicrobiomeFood scienceEcologyBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to associate the net protein losses as well as additional nutritional and microbiome effects of feeding spent brewery grains (SBG) to black solider flies (BSF) that are fed to fish rather than isolating protein from brewery waste using isoelectric precipitation that is directly fed to fish. Following protein loss modelling, a brewery protein isolate (BPI) was produced with a crude protein level of 470 g/kg, which represented an 80 % yield efficiency of protein and was higher that the BSF meal (395 g/kg). Over a three-week cross-over experiment, post-smolt Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) were fed a reference (control) diet or a 30 % substitution with BPI, BSF or soy protein concentrate (SPC) as a control. In addition to the characterisation of the composition of each test ingredient, effects on the nutrient digestibility, palatability and microbiome of each ingredient were assessed. Each diet was fed to a tank of thirty-five salmon (286 ± 20.9 g) for a one-week acclimation period before being stripped of faeces, after which the process repeated twice more to generate three replicates through time. Faeces, diets and ingredients were assessed for protein, and energy digestibilities and by derivation the ingredient digestibilities for these parameters were determined. Feeding the BPI produced in this study to Atlantic salmon showed limited differences in the nutritional value of the BPI compared to the BSF. In addition, both BPI and BSF had beneficial effects on the gut microbiome related to increase in alpha diversity and the abundance of lactic acid bacteria, respectively. Using a systems modelling approach of the net flows of protein from either production method shows that there are massive differences between the potential yields from a BPI approach versus a BSF approach. This has important implications for potential feed protein security, as it shows that from a single tonne of SBG we can get more than a 1000 % difference in protein yields by promoting production of BPI rather than BSF meal production. As such, we suggest that feed grade materials, such as SBG, should not be used in the production of BSF as it represents a substantial loss of protein from the fish feed-chain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it