MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409605016 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-309

Cultural heritage education-driven utilization of NSGA algorithms to construct innovative path design for the inheritance of non-heritage music and art

2025· article· en· W4409605016 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstruct (python library)Inheritance (genetic algorithm)Path (computing)Cultural heritageComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceHistoryBiologyArchaeologyGeneticsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional non-heritage music art is gradually declining, driven by cultural heritage education, this paper studies the future inheritance trend of non-heritage music art.In this paper, the infectious disease dynamics model and complex network propagation theory are used to construct a mathematical model of the inheritance of non-heritage music art, an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm is proposed, and the trend characteristics of the inheritance of non-heritage music art are simulated by solving the parameters of the model through the improved NSGA- algorithm which introduces the congestion calculation method and the crossover strategy.The improved NSGA- algorithm shows better convergence speed of optimization search and uniformity of solution distribution on single peak function and three ZDT functions.Its SP and IGD indexes are much better than the comparison algorithm, with values less than one-half of the comparison algorithm.Taking the heat of non-heritage music and art inheritance in Baidu index for several days as the simulation object, it is found that the simulation of the mathematical model of non-heritage music and art inheritance in this paper has a maximum heat value of 115,000 and the real maximum heat value of 117,241 are not much different from each other, which confirms that this paper's non-heritage music and art inheritance mathematical model has a better fitting effect and reasonableness.The work of this paper has injected new vitality into the innovation of non-heritage music art inheritance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicMusic Technology and Sound StudiesFrench-language works237,207