Cultural heritage education-driven utilization of NSGA algorithms to construct innovative path design for the inheritance of non-heritage music and art
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional non-heritage music art is gradually declining, driven by cultural heritage education, this paper studies the future inheritance trend of non-heritage music art.In this paper, the infectious disease dynamics model and complex network propagation theory are used to construct a mathematical model of the inheritance of non-heritage music art, an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm is proposed, and the trend characteristics of the inheritance of non-heritage music art are simulated by solving the parameters of the model through the improved NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm which introduces the congestion calculation method and the crossover strategy.The improved NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm shows better convergence speed of optimization search and uniformity of solution distribution on single peak function and three ZDT functions.Its SP and IGD indexes are much better than the comparison algorithm, with values less than one-half of the comparison algorithm.Taking the heat of non-heritage music and art inheritance in Baidu index for several days as the simulation object, it is found that the simulation of the mathematical model of non-heritage music and art inheritance in this paper has a maximum heat value of 115,000 and the real maximum heat value of 117,241 are not much different from each other, which confirms that this paper's non-heritage music and art inheritance mathematical model has a better fitting effect and reasonableness.The work of this paper has injected new vitality into the innovation of non-heritage music art inheritance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".