A Study on Enhancing the Efficiency of Digital Content Generation and Distribution Using Natural Language Processing Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under the background of the digital era, the self-media platform breaks the information barriers between the communicators and the receivers, effectively alleviating the information asymmetry problem between the two.Through observation and research, this paper finds that the current channels for receivers to obtain digital information can be divided into user-generated content (UGC), professional-generated content (PGC), and brand-generated content (BGC) according to the classification of the main body, but most of the managers are negligent in the management of these digital contents, and do not really utilize the value of their dissemination.Digital content generation and dissemination based on natural language processing (NLP) technology has become an important way to solve this problem.The method is based on the unified processing of a large amount of corpus, input Word2vec model and Skip-gram model two types of language models for training, with the obtained language model for the required text can be obtained word vectors, the different lengths of the text will be unified vectorization.By introducing evaluation indexes such as dissemination efficiency, content quality and coverage, the effect of generated content can be measured objectively.The value of generating digital content to improve the dissemination efficiency is verified through the evaluation of the actual effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".