MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409605235 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-302

Research and Practice on Optimizing the Innovation of Teaching Methods for Civic and Political Education in Colleges and Universities Based on Deep Neural Networks

2025· article· en· W4409605235 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIdeological and Political Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsEngineering ethicsSociologyMathematics educationPolitical sciencePedagogyPsychologyEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on the innovation of teaching methods for Civic Education in colleges and universities, and provides a structured knowledge framework for teaching by constructing a Civic Knowledge Mapping and integrating course knowledge points.On this basis, a new classroom teaching mode is designed to integrate online and offline teaching resources to enhance student interaction and participation.A knowledge tracking model of key-value memory network (MKVMN) based on multifeature fusion is proposed to accurately track students' mastery of Civics and Politics knowledge by capturing students' multi-dimensional learning behavior characteristics.To optimize the recommended path for students' personalized learning, an improved ant colony algorithm is introduced to generate personalized learning paths based on students' individual differences.The experimental results show that when the number of learning units is 0-10 (pre-study period), the improved ACO algorithm model does not have obvious advantages for students' learning, but when the number of learning units reaches 11-50, the difference between the experimental group students' learning performance and the control group becomes more and more obvious, so it can be seen that the improved ACO algorithm can obviously improve the students' Civic and Political Science learning performance.In addition, the IACS-PRA algorithm is especially effective in long path recommendation, which finds the optimal personalized recommendation path through a gradual approach to help students learn Civics and Political Science more efficiently, and provides a practical demonstration for the digital transformation of Civics and Political Science education in the new era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicIdeological and Political EducationFrench-language works237,207