MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409608421 · doi:10.56326/jpk.v4i2.2458

Gambaran Quarter Life Crisis Mahasiswa di Kota Kendari

2024· article· id· W4409608421 on OpenAlex
Lu'Lu Rifda Safitri, Sri Hayati, Andi Muhammad Aditya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Psikologi Karakter · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)BusinessHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran quarter life crisis Mahasiswa di Kota Kendari. Responden dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 437 responden yang berasal dari berbagai Perguruan Tinggi di Kota Kendari. Alat ukur yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan alat ukur yang dibuat oleh Fadhillah (2020) yang memiliki hasil uji reliabilitas sebesar 0.945 yang mana hasil tersebut menunjukkan reliabilitas yang baik untuk digunakan. Data dalam penelitian diolah menggunakan spss versi 26. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Quarter life crisis responden yang diperoleh yakni sebesar 23,8% sangat tinggi, 30,2% tinggi, lalu 31,4% sedang, kemudian terdapat 7,6% di kategori rendah, dan yang terakhir sebesar 7,1% sangat rendah. Maka karena hasil analisis tersebut, terlihat tingkat kebervariasian quarter life crisis Mahasiswa di Kota Kendari.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it