MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409611154 · doi:10.5430/jct.v14n2p73

The Future of Education in the United States: Emulating the Billion Oyster Curriculum and Community Environmental Restoration Science (STEM + Computer Science) for Secondary School Success

2025· article· en· W4409611154 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lauren Birney, D. McNamara

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiverse Educational Innovations Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumScience educationOysterMathematics educationEnvironmental educationSociologyPedagogyPsychologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent educational developments on the national and regional scale have called for a radical transformation. New York State is reassessing the qualifications needed for high school students to attain a diploma. The federal government is threatening to abolish the United States Department of Education. For students to be prepared to face the challenges of the global economic landscape, several 21st-century skills will be needed. The Billion Oyster Curriculum and Community Environmental Restoration Science (STEM + Computer Science) offers a multifaceted, content-rich, community problem-based model that provides a pattern for similar community involvement while incorporating the competencies and skills needed to become successful in higher education and employment. Student exposure and confidence in STEM content and computational skills enhance their awareness of this as a possible career choice. A student survey which contains a confidence in technological abilities subscale was administered to all subjects of this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curriculum and TeachingSame topicDiverse Educational Innovations StudiesFrench-language works237,207