Multi-dimensional Optimization Research on the Path of Creating Blue Carbon Industry Clusters in Macao-Zhuhai Pole Based on Intelligent Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper combines the development situation of blue carbon industry to formulate the multidimensional optimization model construction of blue carbon industry cluster path.First set the model decision variables and objective function, and divide the constraints.Select the genetic algorithm to solve the optimization model.Determine the research data sources and genetic algorithm parameters, and analyze the multidimensional optimization model.The sensitivity coefficients of each decision variable to the optimization model are 0.2~0.1, and its sensitivity level is III, which means that the selected decision variables meet the research requirements.Compared with the other three algorithms, this paper's genetic algorithm has superiority in four performance indicators, indicating that the genetic algorithm is more suitable for optimization model solving, and finally, the optimization model of this paper is put into the actual blue carbon industry, and it is found that there is a significant difference in the effect of carbon reduction, economic gain, green environmental protection, and satisfaction before and after the optimization (P<0.05), which verifies the effectiveness of this paper's optimization for practical application, and finally, according to the optimization results, the Finally, according to the optimization results, the corresponding optimization path is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".