MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409613627 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-009

Multi-dimensional Optimization Research on the Path of Creating Blue Carbon Industry Clusters in Macao-Zhuhai Pole Based on Intelligent Algorithm

2025· article· en· W4409613627 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPath (computing)Optimization algorithmCarbon fibersComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper combines the development situation of blue carbon industry to formulate the multidimensional optimization model construction of blue carbon industry cluster path.First set the model decision variables and objective function, and divide the constraints.Select the genetic algorithm to solve the optimization model.Determine the research data sources and genetic algorithm parameters, and analyze the multidimensional optimization model.The sensitivity coefficients of each decision variable to the optimization model are 0.2~0.1, and its sensitivity level is III, which means that the selected decision variables meet the research requirements.Compared with the other three algorithms, this paper's genetic algorithm has superiority in four performance indicators, indicating that the genetic algorithm is more suitable for optimization model solving, and finally, the optimization model of this paper is put into the actual blue carbon industry, and it is found that there is a significant difference in the effect of carbon reduction, economic gain, green environmental protection, and satisfaction before and after the optimization (P<0.05), which verifies the effectiveness of this paper's optimization for practical application, and finally, according to the optimization results, the Finally, according to the optimization results, the corresponding optimization path is proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207