A Study on the Design Path of Interdisciplinary Teaching Aids for STEAM Project-Based Learning in the Context of Science Education Based on Multi-Objective Planning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the scheme of multi-objective planning, this paper conducts an in-depth investigation on the design path of interdisciplinary teaching aids for STEAM project-based learning in the context of science education.A multi-objective planning model is constructed, which includes the integration of subject knowledge, the cultivation of students' ability and cost control, and a multi-objective genetic algorithm is introduced to solve the model.The feasibility of the design path of this paper and the enhancement of students in project-based learning are verified through real cases.Compared with the other three schemes, the interdisciplinary teaching aids production using the mathematics and electricity fusion scheme can maximize the Pareto optimality, i.e., the integration of disciplinary knowledge and the cultivation of students' abilities are maximized, as well as the goal of minimizing the production cost.The use of this paper's scheme to produce teaching aids and apply them in course practice can effectively enhance students' interest in learning and course performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".