MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409616243 · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02271-8

DNA-sequencing method maps subsurface fluid flow paths for enhanced monitoring

2025· article· en· W4409616243 on OpenAlexaff
Haitong Yang, Chunlei Yu, Shiqi Wang, Allegra Hosford Scheirer, Xiang‐Zhao Kong, Hui Zhao, Xuewu Yang, Shuoliang Wang, Liangliang Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Earth & Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China-Yunnan Joint FundNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDNA sequencingFlow (mathematics)DNAComputational biologyComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyBiologyGeneticsMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Subsurface technologies including Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage, geothermal systems, and hydrogen storage face persistent technical-economic barriers in monitoring precision and cost-effectiveness. Here we present a DNA sequencing method to track microbial communities in subsurface fluid flow. It addresses three main challenges: the lack of large-scale time-lapse monitoring, the absence of microbial tracer selection, and the oversight of front propagation velocity. The method is applied across all stages of a reservoir’s circulating water injection lifecycle, including initial injection, ongoing circulation, post-injection monitoring, and production. The injection and production well samples are analyzed to select stable microbial tracers, enabling flow-front velocity-integrated mapping of subsurface fluid pathways via principal coordinate analysis. The accuracy is validated through physical simulation experiments and the Kalman filter method, enabling 44-day time-lapse, large-scale dynamic monitoring of 1300m-deep subsurface fluid flow pathways. This study helps reduce uncertainties in geoenergy development, supporting the goal of a net-zero emission world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications Earth & EnvironmentSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207