MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409616946 · doi:10.38035/dit.v1i4.1129

Research on Command Center Design for Districts and Cities in West Java

2024· article· en· W4409616946 on OpenAlex
Hilman Rismayadi, Sigit Wisnuadji, Dian Kusbandiah

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDinasti Information and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal Management and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCenter (category theory)JavaGeographyComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the design of Command Centers for Regencies and Cities in West Java as a control and coordination center in handling emergency situations and decision making. The design of the Command Center includes various supporting facilities such as a reception area, main room, meeting room, equipment room, pantry, rest room, prayer room, and toilet, which are designed to support effective and efficient operations. Using advanced technology in visualization and telecommunications, this Command Center is expected to increase the capacity of local government response to crises that occur, by facilitating better communication and coordination between various stakeholders. This study also considers the specific needs of each region and compliance with applicable standards, so that the resulting design is not only functional but also adaptive to technological developments and future needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it