Measures of Ukrainian Military Diplomacy for the Repatriation of Ukrainian Prisoners of War from Germany (1920)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to explore the specifics regarding the activities of the Ukrainian Military and Sanitary Mission in Germany, focusing on the repatriation of Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) during the first half of 1920. This is based on the report from the Head of the Mission, Mykola Trezvinsky, to Andrii Okopenko, Head of the Military and Sanitary Mission in Central and Southern Europe. The methodology of the study relies on general scientific (analysis, synthesis, generalization), special historical (historical-comparative, problem-chronological), and source studies (external and internal criticism of sources) methods. The scientific novelty of the study stems from introducing Trezvinsky’s report into scientific circulation, which discusses the military, political, and organizational factors influencing the repatriation process between March and May 1920, as well as reassessing the roles of Germany and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in organizing evacuation. The original document, found in the Central State Archives of Higher Authorities and Administration of Ukraine (TsDAVO Ukrainy) and a copy in the Central Military Archives of Poland (Centralne Archiwum Wojskowe), is being published for the first time. The prospect of further research lies in the reassessment of information in documents that highlight the specifics of the repatriation of Ukrainian POWs from Germany after World War I and determining the role of Ukrainian military diplomacy in facilitating this process. Conclusions. The analyzed and published report of Mykola Trezvinsky, Head of the Ukrainian Military and Sanitary Mission in Germany, for March–May 1920, reveals the preconditions, consequences, and significance of the measures taken by Ukrainian military diplomacy in organizing the repatriation and providing assistance to Ukrainian POWs in German camps at the time. It details the influence of geopolitical events, organizational and financial obstacles in carrying out the evacuation, highlights the numerical composition and sentiments of the prisoners, and clarifies the attitude of the German authorities and the ICRC toward the transportation of prisoners to Ukraine. References: 1. Bruski, J. (2000). Petlurowcy : Centrum Państwowe Ukraińskiej Republiki Ludowej na wychodźstwie (1919–1924) [The Petlurovists : the State Center of the Ukrainian People’s Republic in Exile (1919–1924)]. Kraków [in Polish].2. Minaieva, T. (2014). Rosiiski viiskovopoloneni v Avstro-Uhorshchyni ta Nimechchyni v roky Pershoi svitovoi viiny [Russian prisoners of war in Austria-Hungary and Germany during World War I] (Candidate’s thesis). Chernivetskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Yuriia Fedkovycha. Chernivtsi [in Ukrainian].3. Nachtigal, R. (2008). The Repatriation and Reception of Returning Prisoners of War, 1918–22. Immigrants & Minorities : Historical Studies in Ethnicity, Migration and Diaspora, 26:1–2, 157–184 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1080/026192808024426624. Narizhnyi, S. (1942). Ukrainska emigratsiia. Kulturna pratsia ukrainskoi emigratsii mizh dvoma Svitovymy viinamy [Ukrainian emigration. Cultural work of Ukrainian emigration between two world wars] (Vol. 1). Praha : Studii Muzeiu Vyzvolnoi Borotby Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].5. Oltmer, J. (2016). Abwicklung einer Kriegsfolgelast : die Repatriierung der Kriegsgefangenen des Ersten Weltkriegs [Dealing with the aftermath of war : the repatriation of prisoners of war of the First World War]. In Handbuch Staat und Migration in Deutschland seit dem 17. Jahrhundert, 419–438 [in German]. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110345391-0136. Soloviova, V. (2006). Dyplomatychna diialnist ukrainskykh natsionalnykh uriadiv 1917–1921 rr. [Dyplomatic activity of Ukrainian national governments, 1917–1921]. Kyiv, Donetsk [in Ukrainian].7. Sribniak, I. & Sribniak, M. (2019). Ukrainska viiskovo-sanitarna misiia v Nimechchyni i taborovi hromady polonenykh ukraintsiv u 1919 r. [Ukrainian Military and Sanitary Mission in Germany and Ukrainian prisoner-of-war camp communities in 1919]. Eminak : naukovyi shchokvartalnyk, 2(26), 66–75 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2019.2(26).2928. Sribniak, I. (1999). Poloneni ukraintsi v Avstro-Uhorshchyni ta Nimechchyni (1914–1920 rr.) [Ukrainian prisoners of war in Austria-Hungary and Germany (1914–1920)]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].9. Sribniak, I. (1999). Repatriatsiina diialnist ukrainskykh dyplomatychnykh i viiskovo-sanitarnykh ustanov u Yevropi v 1918 r. [Repatriation activity of Ukrainian diplomatic, military and sanitary institutions in Europe in 1918]. Studii z arkhivnoi spravy ta dokumentoznavstva, 5, 259–263 [in Ukrainian].10. Sribniak, M. (2021). Actions of Ukrainian Diplomacy on the Organization of Ukrainian Prisoners’ of War Repatriation Process from the Territories of Germany and Austro-Hungary (1918–1919). Facta Simonidis, 2(14), 217–228 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.56583/fs.2311. Steuer, K. (2009). Pursuit of an «Unparalleled Opportunity» : The American YMCA and Prisoner-of-War Diplomacy among the Central Power Nations during World War I, 1914–1923. New York : Columbia University Press [in English].12. Williams, R. (1967). Russian War Prisoners and Soviet-German Relations : 1918–1921. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 9:2, 270–295 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.1967.11091091
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it