Assessment of the Patient’s Perceived Fear and Anxiety During Ambulatory Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate: A Prospective, Real-Practice Study from a Single Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Objective: Ambulatory holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) has shown low rates of readmission and postoperative complications. However, the patient’s experience has been undervalued. We aimed to measure the patient’s perceived fear and anxiety during ambulatory HoLEP. Methods: We performed a prospective study on patients scheduled for HoLEP at our institution. We excluded patients with cognitive or psychiatric disorders and those who had to be hospitalized. The week preceding the surgery, we administered the Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) by phone. The day following the surgery, we readministered the HADS and asked the patients if they would undergo HoLEP in the same setting. Key Findings and Limitations: Overall, 70 patients completed the study (mean age 72.3, standard deviation [SD] 6.5 years). The mean SFQ score was 18.4/90 (SD 13.5); the two highest rated items were “I am afraid of pain after the operation” and “I am afraid of unpleasant side effects after the operation.” with a mean of 3.7/10 and 2.7/10, respectively. For the HADS, the mean preoperative score was 4.6/21 (SD 3.4), and the mean postoperative score was 3.9/21 (SD 3.0), with a mean difference of −0.7 ( p = 0.059). The majority (90%) of patients reported they would undergo HoLEP in the same setting. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Most patients described low levels of anxiety and fear, and would undergo ambulatory HoLEP again. Given the high satisfaction and low levels of anxiety, widespread adoption of ambulatory HoLEP should be considered. Patient Summary: Men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, or an enlarged prostate, often need surgery to improve urinary function. We studied the acceptability of same-day discharge surgery for this condition by assessing patients’ anxiety, fear, and willingness to repeat the procedure. Most patients described low levels of anxiety and fear, and would undergo ambulatory HoLEP again.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".