MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409622343 · doi:10.1007/s12016-025-09045-2

Targeting IL-13 and IL-4 in Asthma: Therapeutic Implications on Airway Remodeling in Severe Asthma

2025· review· en· W4409622343 on OpenAlexaff
Lina Sahnoon, Khuloud Bajbouj, Bassam Mahboub, Rifat Hamoudi, Qutayba Hamid

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersUniversity of Sharjah
KeywordsAsthmaAirwayMedicineAllergyImmunologyIntensive care medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disorder affecting individuals across all age groups. It is characterized by airway inflammation and remodeling and leads to progressive airflow restriction. While corticosteroids remain a mainstay therapy, their efficacy is limited in severe asthma due to genetic and epigenetic alterations, as well as elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-13 (IL-13), and interleukin-5 (IL-5), which drive structural airway changes including subepithelial fibrosis, smooth muscle hypertrophy, and goblet cell hyperplasia. This underscores the critical need for biologically targeted therapies. This review systematically examines the roles of IL-4 and IL-13, key drivers of type-2 inflammation, in airway remodeling and their potential as therapeutic targets. IL-4 orchestrates eosinophil recruitment, immunoglobulin class switching, and Th2 differentiation, whereas IL-13 directly modulates structural cells, including fibroblasts and epithelial cells, to promote mucus hypersecretion and extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition. Despite shared signaling pathways, IL-13 emerges as the dominant cytokine in remodeling processes including mucus hypersecretion, fibrosis and smooth muscle hypertrophy. While IL-4 primarily amplifies inflammatory cascades by driving IgE switching, promoting Th2 cell polarization that sustain cytokine release, and inducing chemokines to recruit eosinophils. In steroid-resistant severe asthma, biologics targeting IL-4/IL-13 show promise in reducing exacerbations and eosinophilic inflammation. However, their capacity to reverse established remodeling remains inconsistent, as clinical trials prioritize inflammatory biomarkers over long-term structural outcomes. This synthesis highlights critical gaps in understanding the durability of IL-4/IL-13 inhibition on airway structure and advocates for therapies combining biologics with remodeling-specific strategies. Through the integration of mechanistic insights and clinical evidence, this review emphasizes the need for long-term studies utilizing advanced imaging, histopathological techniques, and patient-reported outcomes to evaluate how IL-4/IL-13-targeted therapies alter airway remodeling and symptom burden, thereby informing more effective treatment approaches for severe, steroid-resistant asthma. Schematic representation of the roles of IL-4 and IL-13 in driving inflammation and airway remodeling in asthma. IL-4 primarily contributes to inflammation by (1) promoting Type 2 helper T (Th2) cell differentiation from naïve T cells, (2) stimulating IgE production by B cells, and (3) enhancing eosinophil recruitment. Conversely, IL-13 is predominantly involved in airway remodeling through (1) inducing goblet cell hyperplasia and excessive mucus production, (2) promoting fibrosis, (3) driving smooth muscle hypertrophy and hyperresponsiveness, and (4) activating or damaging airway epithelial cells (AEC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Reviews in Allergy & ImmunologySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207