Predicting handsheet properties and enhancing refiner control using fiber analyzer data and latent variable modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focuses on the development of a compact model with improved interpretability compared to similar approaches, relating thermomechanical pulp (TMP) properties, quantified using a fiber analyzer, to Canadian standard freeness and handsheet properties. The data used in this study are obtained from TMP produced by a conical disc refiner. Utilizing the LASSO-regularized Latent Variable Regression (LASSO-LVR) model, we identified three key latent variables – representing shives content, fibrillation, and slender fines content – that accurately predict eight distinct handsheet properties. In a subsequent analysis, we investigated the linkage between refiner settings and Specific Refining Energy (SRE) to these key analyzer readings and, consequently, to handsheet properties. The inclusion of SRE as an internal state variable in the model significantly enhanced predictive accuracy, providing a foundation for more precise and energy-efficient control strategies in refining processes. • A compact model predicts TMP handsheet properties using LASSO-regularized regression. • Three key latent variables predict eight handsheet properties from pulp data. • CD refiner controls insufficient to predict TMP handsheet properties directly. • Specific Refining Energy improves control strategies and predictive accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".