MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409629181 · doi:10.23939/law2025.45.072

Practical Implementation of Victimization Crime Prevention in the Anglo-American Legal Family

2025· article· en· W4409629181 on OpenAlex
Mariia Koval

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVisnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika» Seria Uridicni nauki · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriminologyCrime preventionPolitical scienceComputer securityPsychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The victimization approach to crime prevention is a key element of modern criminal policy. In the Anglo-American legal family (USA, UK, Canada, Australia), this approach is based on the principles of integration of preventive, rehabilitation and legal mechanisms to reduce the risks of victimization. The article discusses the main practical aspects of victimization prevention in these countries. Victimological crime prevention is an important component of criminal policy aimed at reducing the risk of crime by reducing the vulnerability of potential victims. In the Anglo-American legal system based on the common law, this issue has its own peculiarities and practical aspects of implementation. The article analyzes the practical implementation of the victimization approach to crime prevention in the countries of the Anglo-American legal family. In these countries, considerable attention is paid to the implementation of programs aimed at minimizing the risks of victimization and creating conditions for the protection of persons who may become potential victims of a criminal offense. The study focuses on practical measures such as: implementing programs to raise public awareness of vulnerable situations; developing educational campaigns to prevent repeat victimization; using modern technologies to protect citizens; and developing specialized support programs for victims of crime. The experience of the countries of the Anglo-American legal family demonstrates that a comprehensive approach that combines preventive, technological and rehabilitation measures is effective in reducing victimization and crime. The practical implementation of victimization crime prevention in the Anglo-American legal family demonstrates the effectiveness of a comprehensive approach that combines educational, technological and legal measures. The experience of these countries can serve as an example for other states in creating a victim protection and crime prevention system. Based on the experience of the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada, the author examines successful examples of victimization measures that can be adapted to other legal systems. The article emphasizes the importance of integrating victimization approaches into crime prevention strategies, focusing on minimizing the impact of crime on society and strengthening legal culture. Keywords: prevention, crime, areas, victimization, crime prevention, Аnglo-American legal family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it