MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409630718 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-5932

Abstract 5932: Molecular determinants of 10-second diagnosis of brain cancer types with laser mass spectrometry

2025· article· en· W4409630718 on OpenAlexaff
Alexa Fiorante, Michael Woolman, David F. Muñoz, Lan Anna Ye, Taira Kiyota, Sunit Das, Ahmed Aman, Howard J. Ginsberg, Gelareh Zadeh, Arash Zarrine‐Afsar

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMass spectrometryCancerMedicineOncologyInternal medicineChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Surveys of neurosurgical outcome data have suggested suitable extents (aggressiveness) of resection to improve survival for many brain cancer types. Here, personalization of the extent of resection relies on highly subjective intraoperative diagnoses wherein the depth of the diagnostic information depends on the level of experience of the pathologist. Picosecond InfraRed Laser Mass Spectrometry (PIRL-MS) uses picosecond bursts of mid- infrared laser radiation to extract, in a non-thermal manner, tissue lipids (1) present in cellular membranes, giving cells and nuclei their unique shapes (utilized in morphometric pathology with staining & microscopy) and (2) altered in tumorigenesis due to cross-talk with cellular signalling in metabolism (potentially also revealing cancer molecular subtypes in 10 seconds as shown) for real-time profiling of molecular content unique to each tumour type. In our laboratory, close to 1, 300 frozen brain cancer specimens over 30 different classes of adult and pediatric cancers are being subjected PIRL-MS to build a comprehensive molecular signature library using various supervised and unsupervised dimensionality reduction and data analysis methods. The sensitivity and specificity of the integrated morphometric and molecular diagnosis for pediatric brain cancers with 10-second PIRL-MS was > 96%. This classification could use as little as only 18 tissue lipids whose identities were determined using chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Greater than 90% sensitivity and specificity have been obtained for adult brain cancer classifications with 10-second PIRL-MS analysis utilizing 40 lipids spanning fatty acids, phospholipids and ceramides. PIRL-MS can provide non-subjective differentiation between various brain cancer types with as little as 10 seconds of sampling and analysis time. Citation Format: Alexa Fiorante, Michael Woolman, David Munoz, Lan Anna Ye, Taira Kiyota, Sunit Das, Ahmed Aman, Howard Ginsberg, Gelareh Zadeh, Arash Zarrine-Afsar. Molecular determinants of 10-second diagnosis of brain cancer types with laser mass spectrometry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 5932.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies→French-language works237,207→