MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409631335 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-4771

Abstract 4771: A novel immunotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer: A monoclonal antibody that can bind both STEAP1 and STEAP2

2025· article· en· W4409631335 on OpenAlexaffabout
Minzhi Sheng, Boyang Su, Amanda Sparkes, Gobi Thillainadesan, Esther Matus, Jessica Wright, Stanley K. Liu, Jean Gariépy, Hon S. Leong

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclonal antibodyProstate cancerImmunotherapyMedicineCancerProstateCancer researchAntibodyMonoclonalImmunologyOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer among Canadian men, with metastatic PCa (mPCa) patients having a 5-year survival rate of only 30%. However, the prostate-specific membrane antigen, a key target in PCa therapy, is expressed in many normal tissues and shows heterogeneity among PCa patients. Recently, Six Transmembrane Epithelial Antigens of the Prostate 1 and 2 (STEAP1 and STEAP2) have gained attention as promising therapeutic targets due to their high expression in most PCa cases compared to normal tissues and essential organs. This study aimed to develop a novel immunotherapy targeting STEAP1/2 to elicit PCa-specific immune responses in cellular and animal mPCa models. Monoclonal antibodies were generated against the extracellular region of STEAP1, which shares 60% sequence similarity with STEAP2 but has minimal homology with other human proteins. The specificity and binding strength of these antibodies were validated through techniques such as immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, immunoprecipitation, and ELISA. Results from immunofluorescence and flow cytometry using STEAP1 overexpression and knockdown PCa cell lines demonstrated the specificity of certain clones for human STEAP1. Furthermore, one antibody clone successfully pulled down STEAP2 in immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry experiments and showed binding to STEAP2 in cell lines overexpressing the antigen. ELISA results revealed binding affinities in the low nanomolar range for STEAP1 and the low micromolar range for STEAP2.These findings highlight the potential of the monoclonal STEAP1/2 antibody developed in this study, providing a promising platform for future immunotherapy strategies and expanding treatment options for mPCa patients. Citation Format: Minzhi Sheng, Boyang Su, Amanda Sparkes, Gobi Thillainadesan, Esther Matus, Jessica Wright, Stanley Liu, Jean Gariepy, Hon S. Leong. A novel immunotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer: A monoclonal antibody that can bind both STEAP1 and STEAP2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4771.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→