MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409633726 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-5411

Abstract 5411: The IL-23 receptor localizes intracellularly in AML and stem cells where it regulates mitotic spindle formation to maintain cell viability

2025· article· en· W4409633726 on OpenAlexaff
Nathan Duong, Dilshad H. Khan, Geethu Emily Thomas, Yue Feng, Rose Hurren, Jong Bok Lee, Jonathan St‐Germain, Lily Drimmer, Yongran Yan, Lan-Xin Zhang, Dakai Ling, Lucile Mary, Neil MacLean, Marcela Gronda, Vincent Rondeau, Brandon D. Brown, Laura Pascual Matellán, Courtney L. Jones, Hong Chang, Andrea Arruda, Stephanie Xie, Laurence Pelletier, Mark D. Minden, Zhang Li, Steven M. Kornblau, Brian Raught, Kevin A. Jacobs, Daniel Goede, Vito Spadavecchio, Aaron D. Schimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence research
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteToronto General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStem cellCell biologyMitosisCancer researchViability assayBiologyCellReceptorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract IL-23 receptor (IL-23R) is canonically a T cell surface cytokine receptor known for its role in inflammatory diseases. In this study, we demonstrated that IL-23R localizes intracellularly in AML where it regulates mitotic spindle formation. Differential gene expressions were analyzed in AML samples compared to normal controls. Of the upregulated processes, the mitotic spindle ontology was most enriched. Analyzing all protein coding genes for their correlation to the mitotic spindle ontology surprisingly returned IL-23R as a top hit. We confirmed IL-23R expression in 7 of 7 tested AML cell lines and 15 of 20 primary AML patient samples. Protein expression was >2 fold higher in AML compared to normal hematopoietic (n=5) and CD34+ sorted cells (n=3).Canonical IL-23R cell surface expression was confirmed in T cells, but minimal amounts were detected on AML cells. Rather, in AML cells, primary AML samples, and AML stem cells, IL-23R was detected intracellularly as determined by 4 different modalities using 4 different epitope targeting antibodies. IL-23R’s heterodimeric subunit, IL-12Rβ1, was also detected intracellularly in AML cells. We performed BioID mass spectrometry to identify novel interactors with IL-23R. Pathway analysis of interactors returned mitotic spindle formation as a top pathway. We confirmed interactions between IL-23R and mitotic spindle proteins (NuMA, TMEM201, TACC1, BAG6) via proximity ligation assays in bulk and leukemic stem cell (LSC) sorted AML cells. Furthermore, in bulk AML and LSC sorted fractions, we demonstrated that IL-23R colocalized with the mitotic spindle and centrosomes via confocal microscopy. IL-23R interacted with the mitotic spindle via its (S/T)x(I/L)P motif (amino acids 588-591). IL-12Rβ1 was also found at the mitotic spindle with exogenous IL-23 in culture promoting intracellular translocation of IL-23R. Depletion of IL-23R led to dysregulation of the mitotic spindle with spindle defects such as multipolarity and lagging chromosomes. Additionally, in IL-23R depleted mitotic AML cells, NuMA has decreased localization to mitotic spindle poles thus attenuating its ability to regulate mitotic spindle assembly. Knockdown of IL-23R reduced proliferation and clonogenic growth, reduced marrow engraftment, and increased differentiation of AML cells, thus demonstrating an effect on the leukemia initiating cells. In normal hematopoietic cells, however, knockdown of IL-23R did not impair engraftment. Consistent with this, constitutive homozygote IL-23R knockout mice had no difference in complete blood counts and stem cell number/function compared to wild type mice. In summary, intracellular IL-23R regulates mitotic spindle formation to maintain AML and stem cell growth and viability. We demonstrated a novel function and intracellular localization for IL-23R and its potential as a therapeutic target in AML. Citation Format: Nathan Duong, Dilshad H. Khan, Geethu E. Thomas, Yue Feng, Rose Hurren, Jong Bok Lee, Jonathan St-Germain, Lily Drimmer, Yongran Yan, Lan Xin Zhang, Dakai Ling, Mary L. Ma, Neil MacLean, Marcela Gronda, Vincent Rondeau, Brandon D. Brown, Laura Matellán, Courtney L. Jones, Hong Chang, Andrea Arruda, Stephanie Xie, Laurence Pelletier, Mark D. Minden, Li Zhang, Steven M. Kornblau, Brian Raught, Kevin Jacobs, Max G. Jacobs, Daniel Goede, Vito Spadavecchio, Aaron D. Schimmer. The IL-23 receptor localizes intracellularly in AML and stem cells where it regulates mitotic spindle formation to maintain cell viability [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 5411.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence researchFrench-language works237,207