MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409633818 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-2758

Abstract 2758: Methylome plasticity as a biomarker of treatment response in small cell lung cancer

2025· article· en· W4409633818 on OpenAlexaffabout
Danielle Benedict Sacdalan, Sami Ul Haq, Luna Jia Zhan, Janice J.N. Li, Vivek M. Philip, Scott V. Bratman, Geoffrey Liu, Benjamin H. Lok

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiomarkerLung cancerCancerBiologyDNA methylationMedicineCancer researchOncologyInternal medicineGeneticsGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with poor treatment outcomes, in part due to epigenetic mechanisms driving tumor growth and resistance. Cell-free DNA methylome profiles in untreated SCLC can identify prognostic sub-groups, making it a useful biomarker. In this study, we hypothesize that changes in the cell free methylome of SCLC influence disease response to therapy and drive treatment resistance. Methods: Cell free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq) was performed on 34 baseline-relapse paired samples belonging to a cohort of SCLC patients treated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, Canada). Matched leukocyte DNA methylation profiles were incorporated to exclude the contribution of non-cancer methylation to the cfMeDIP signal and allow focused profiling of changes in the SCLC methylome through first-line treatment. The plasticity of the SCLC methylome was determined by subtracting the reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM) at the time of progression compared to the pre-treatment timepoint. A methylome demonstrated plasticity if it showed an increase or decrease in reads compared to the median RPKM across all samples in the cohort. Associations between methylation groups and relevant clinical data were identified. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were performed to determine if methylome changes were associated with overall survival and progression-free survival, anchored from the time of SCLC diagnosis. KEGG pathways corresponding to the top differentially methylated windows between baseline and relapse pairs were identified and characterized. Results: Plasticity of the SCLC methylome were seen in 67% of patients (n=23/34). Methylome plasticity was found to be associated with a shorter time to progression from the end of first-line treatment (mean difference = 70 days; 95% CI 25-115, p = 0.0031). Accordingly, patients with greater methylome plasticity were more likely to be platinum resistant (57% vs. 17%; χ-squared p = 0.033). Cox regression showed that methylome plasticity was significantly associated with worse progression free survival (PFS) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 5.7, p = 0.0010) and overall survival (OS) (aHR = 1.9, p = 0.11), after adjusting for VA stage at diagnosis. Pathway analysis of differentially methylated windows mapped to genes related to neuronal polarity and axonal guidance, as well as Wnt signaling. Conclusion: Changes in cell-free DNA methylomes serve as a biomarker for treatment response in SCLC. Increased plasticity of the methylome is associated with shorter PFS. The underlying biology of this relationship may involve changes in pathways that govern neuronal change and established cancer-associated pathways. Citation Format: Danielle Benedict Sacdalan, Sami Ul Haq, Luna Jia Zhan, Janice J. Li, Vivek Philip, Scott V. Bratman, Geoffrey Liu, Benjamin H. Lok. Methylome plasticity as a biomarker of treatment response in small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2758.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicLung Cancer Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207