MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409636782 · doi:10.1080/08164622.2025.2486662

Accessing emergency eye care by therapeutically qualified optometrists: a simulated-patient study in Quebec, Canada

2025· article· en· W4409636782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Optometry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEye careOptometryMedicineEmergency departmentPatient careOphthalmologyMedical emergencyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical relevance Therapeutically qualified optometrists are important providers of emergency eye care. To provide insight on how to optimise accessibility of a population to emergency care, it is helpful to examine factors which go beyond the scope of practice and number of practitioners in a jurisdiction.Background Therapeutically qualified optometrists play an important role in managing ocular emergencies. This study assesses the accessibility of emergency eye care for a new patient in Quebec and explores associated factors such as geographical region of practices and morbidity of patient symptoms.Methods Cross-sectional study using simulated-patient design. Scripted phone calls were placed to optometry practices, posing as patients seeking emergency care. A random sample of Quebec practices was stratified by region: urban, peri-urban, and rural. Each practice received one call for a simulated conjunctivitis (low morbidity) and one for a simulated retinal break (high morbidity). Outcomes included obtaining an appointment, time-to-appointment and out-of-pocket costs.Results Eighty-nine practices participated: 30 urban, 30 peri-urban and 29 rural. Some 46% of practices granted at least one eye emergency appointment (n = 41) with significant differences between regions: 40% in urban areas, 30% in peri-urban areas and 69% in rural areas (p = 0.008). Overall, median delay to obtain an appointment was 3.7 hours (interquartile range = 1.8–6.3) and median fee was 55 Canadian dollars (interquartile range 50–65). Low-morbidity appointments were granted slightly more often (p = 0.07). Neither time-to-appointment nor fees differed significantly with morbidity or type of region.Conclusion In this simulated-patient study, less than half of optometry practices offered an emergency appointment to new patients in Quebec; more appointments were granted in rural areas and for low morbidity conditions. In a jurisdiction with many therapeutically qualified optometrists across its territory, accessibility to emergency eye care was somewhat limited, with significant geographical differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.454 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it