MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409639363 · doi:10.1080/13588265.2025.2492998

Combining Virtual CRASH and MADYMO to reconstruct motor vehicle collision dynamics and assess injury risk to occupants

2025· article· en· W4409639363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Crashworthiness · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotor vehicle crashCollisionCrashPoison controlCrashworthinessEngineeringAutomotive engineeringHuman factors and ergonomicsInjury preventionDynamics (music)Physical medicine and rehabilitationComputer scienceAeronauticsSimulationMedicineComputer securityPsychologyMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We evaluated Virtual CRASH motion output as input to MADYMO for assessing risk of injury to rear seat occupants of a vehicle involved in a three-vehicle collision. The vehicle accelerometer records captured by the vehicle’s EDR served as a reference. We determined that Virtual CRASH can faithfully reproduce crash scene evidence and general vehicle motion, but it overestimates peak accelerations during impacts, which would lead to overestimating the risk of injuries. Although EDR records provide a reliable input for MADYMO, since they are only 0.3 s in duration and represent vehicle motion in the reference frame of the vehicle, their utility in reconstructing events following an impact is limited. We demonstrate the utility of combining Virtual CRASH with MADYMO to reconstruct the entire sequence of events during the collision and accurately assess the risk of injury to the rear seat occupants of the most damaged vehicle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it