MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409640490 · doi:10.1186/s43238-025-00177-0

‘We who move’: the built environment of nomads in the Suleiman Mountains of Balochistan, Pakistan

2025· article· en· W4409640490 on OpenAlexaff
Ayesha Pamela Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilt Heritage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Conflicts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureGeographyAncient historyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper looks at nomad pastoralists migrating back and forth through the Suleiman Mountains of northern Balochistan, as part of their annual movements and importantly as guides for historic caravans. These caravans brought trade goods, particularly Central Asian horses, from the west to India. This ‘Silk Road’ link is central to the Karez System Cultural Landscape World Heritage nomination. Due to limitations on funding, challenges of physical access, politics and local conflicts, much of the research on these historic nomad movements and their built environment has been carried out using remote sensing imagery. It is possible to follow their trails marked in the images by compacted pathways, campsites, corrals, trail-side cemeteries and soil discolourations. This transient heritage is critically threatened as these nomad groups have been refused entry into Pakistan from Afghanistan due to border closures and conflict. The imagery over time shows how the nomadic built environment is becoming a layer of archaeological deposits. The most interesting challenge is how can this kind of ‘minimal heritage’ be documented, conserved and managed and whether it is possible to design a methodology for its preservation in some form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuilt HeritageSame topicSouth Asian Studies and ConflictsFrench-language works237,207