MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409641345 · doi:10.1109/tps.2025.3556771

A Novel Three-Phase Tubular Permanent Magnet Linear Generator for Free-Piston Stirling Engines

2025· article· en· W4409641345 on OpenAlexaff
Xing Wang, Hao Chen, Yongqiang Liu, Hossein Torkaman, Xiaodong Li, Ryszard Paƚka, Jason Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersShenzhen International Cooperation Research Project
KeywordsStirling enginePiston (optics)MagnetGenerator (circuit theory)Permanent magnet synchronous generatorPhase (matter)Linear congruential generatorThree-phaseMechanical engineeringElectrical engineeringControl theory (sociology)Materials sciencePhysicsComputer scienceVoltageEngineeringPower (physics)Optics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes an air-cored three-phase tubular permanent magnet linear generator (3P-TPMLG) with a novel free-piston Stirling engines (FPSEs) structure. First, the concrete construction and initial dimensions of the 3P-TPMLG are given through design principles and experience. Second, the mover’s basic working principle and operational process are discussed using relevant equations and the isolines distribution of magnetic vector potential at several typical mover positions. Third, the 2-D and 3-D machine models established by finite element analysis (FEA) software FLUX and electromagnetic field analysis are presented. Furthermore, two pivotal parameters are optimized to improve operating conditions and output performance of 3P-TPMLG. Finally, the output parameters of 3P-TPMLG are solved separately by FLUX under the constant and sinusoidal velocities. Following finite element dynamic simulation verification, 3P-TPMLG has good power output at both unchanged and sinusoidal velocities. Meanwhile, when the reciprocating frequency is 80 Hz, and the proportion of permanent magnet (PM) length in half pole pitch is 7/10, the comprehensive evaluation of the generator is optimal. The novel structural 3P-TPMLG for FPSEs can realize symmetrical three-phase power generation when the mover reciprocates linear motion at a sinusoidal velocity. Besides, the comparisons prove that the 3P-TPMLG has the advantages of high efficiency, high power generation density, and low construction price.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Plasma ScienceSame topicAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and EnginesFrench-language works237,207