MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Novel AI-Genetics Algorithm for Renewable Bioenergy Generation in City Centers

2025· article· en· W4409642165 on OpenAlexaff
Adham M. Elmalky, Mohamad T. Araji

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioenergyRenewable energyComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transforming cities into net producers of energy allows urban environments to mitigate the challenges of climate change. Such a transformation requires navigating efficient typologies of new ecosystems and buildings by integrating renewable energy sources into existing infrastructure. Bioenergy is among such sources that harness solar energy to produce biomass, act as natural carbon sinks, and generate oxygen through photosynthesis to improve air quality and support urban resilience. This study constructed a full-scale bioenergy system, with real-time biomass monitoring facilitated by an RGB image-based technique. Neural Networks were then integrated into Genetic Algorithms to improve search efficiency and reduce optimization time. Datasets containing fewer than 100 points exhibited lower predictive accuracy, with a 10-point Neural Network yielding a correlation coefficient of 0.661, and a 50-point Neural Network showing a correlation coefficient of 0.599. As the dataset size increased beyond 150 points, the Neural Network achieved a perfect linear correlation, reflected in a correlation coefficient of 1. Neural Network-Aided Genetic Algorithm optimized the system in just 6 minutes, a remarkable enhancement over the original algorithm that required 24.4 hours. Overall, the study highlights the potential of integrating AI-driven optimization and monitoring techniques into bioenergy systems, contributing to sustainable building designs that enhance renewable bioenergy production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207