MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409645999 · doi:10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-99

Optimal Utilization of Port Free-of-Charge Storage for Non-Instantaneously Deteriorating Items with Time-Varying Order Quantity Dependent Demand with Green Technology Investment during Transit

2025· article· en· W4409645999 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anthony Limi, K. Rangarajan, Imen Ali Kallel, Yassine Saoudi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorthern Border University
KeywordsTransit timeOrder (exchange)Investment (military)Charge (physics)Operations researchOperations managementBusinessMicroeconomicsMathematicsEconomicsEngineeringTransport engineeringFinancePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an innovative inventory model for non-instantaneously deteriorating items with time-varying order quantity-dependent demand. The model strategically utilizes port-provided free storage periods to optimize inventory management across a distribution system comprising one port storage and an owned storage. While most industries rely on owned or rented warehouses to store goods before distributing them to retailers, this model proposes a more cost-efficient approach by leveraging the port’s free storage period as a temporary warehouse until the free duration expires. By investing in energy-efficient green equipment, this approach decreases carbon emissions during product transit between the port and warehouse, as well as to industries. This allows companies to delay the incurrence of holding costs and optimize resource allocation, thereby minimizing total inventory costs while maintaining service levels. The model’s theoretical foundation is verified using numerical examples, which emphasize significant findings on cost optimization and efficient inventory dynamics. Additionally, a comprehensive sensitivity analysis conducted using MATLAB reveals the impact of various parameter modifications, offering valuable insights for decision-makers across diverse industrial settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207