MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409646061 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5222406

Fault Diagnosis in Photovoltaic Systems Using Machine Learning Algorithms

2025· preprint· en· W4409646061 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Patience Tifuh Taah, Derek Ajesam Asoh, Jerome Ndam Mungwe, Nkwatoh Therese Ncheuveu, Noel Nkwa Awangum

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWest African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land UseInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemComputer scienceFault (geology)AlgorithmMachine learningArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectrical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by environmental concerns, the global energy landscape is undergoing a significant shift from use of fossil fuels to renewable energy sources. Solar energy, particularly through photovoltaic (PV) technology, has emerged as a prominent renewable energy source. However, use of PV systems faces challenges due to fault occurrences, which negatively impact their efficiency and power output. With machine learning revolutionizing the energy sector, expectations hold in offering potential solutions to fault diagnosis challenges in PV systems. This study focuses on utilizing machine learning algorithms (MLA) for fault diagnosis in PV systems. Through a MATLAB simulation of a 7.5 kW PV system, three fault scenarios were implemented to generate the dataset. MLAs were trained and tested using MATLAB classification application, with cross and hold-out validation techniques employed for model validation. Results revealed that the wide neural network algorithm achieved the highest accuracy, reaching 96.30% during training and 98.39% during testing with the cross validation of 10 folds. The ensemble algorithms also demonstrated promising results, achieving accuracies of 93.73% and 94.06% during training and testing, respectively, with cross-validation. These findings underscore the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms in accurately diagnosing faults in PV systems, offering valuable insights for PV system maintenance to ensure efficiency, reliability, availability, and overall performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207